A public stewardship model for the Operating Specification Standard.
This charter defines how the Operating Specification Standard should evolve from an Aegora-initiated draft into a more durable public standard with visible governance, release discipline, and ecosystem participation.
Why the charter exists
The charter gives the standards effort a visible operating model. It clarifies what the committee is responsible for, what belongs in working groups, how releases should be handled, and how outside participants can influence the standard without relying on private interpretation.
What the committee should protect
The charter is meant to protect the durability, portability, and governance semantics of the standard as it grows.
How stewardship can be divided
The initial model is intentionally lightweight, but each group has a distinct responsibility.
Steering group
Owns charter, release scope, dispute resolution, and the long-term direction of the standards program.
Technical working group
Maintains schema evolution, example packages, validator expectations, and compatibility guidance.
Governance and assurance group
Reviews policy semantics, approval posture, auditability, evidence expectations, and human fallback rules.
Ecosystem advisory group
Represents adopters, partners, enterprises, MSPs, and runtime builders who need the standard to remain usable.
How public revisions should behave
The committee should make releases easy to track, compare, and implement across multiple builders and runtimes.
- Publish a versioned changelog entry for every public release.
- Separate normative changes from explanatory or editorial updates.
- Require written rationale for breaking or materially reinterpreting changes.
- Pair major revisions with updated starter or reference package artifacts whenever possible.
- Prefer additive evolution over abrupt structural churn unless interoperability requires otherwise.
How the committee should grow
The first chartered version can begin with Aegora maintainers and a small number of design partners. As the standard gains traction, the committee should add external implementers, partner products, and enterprise practitioners who can test the standard in real operating conditions.
Pair governance with visible releases and downloadable artifacts.
A standards program becomes credible when the charter, changelog, and starter materials reinforce each other publicly.